Richard Rohr, in The Universal Christ, that “Brain studies have shown that we may be hardwired to focus on problems at the expense of a positive vision. The human brain wraps around fear and problems like Velcro. We dwell on bad experiences long after the fact, and spend vast amounts of energy anticipating what might go wrong in the future. Conversely, positivity and gratitude and simple happiness slide away like cheese on hot Teflon. Studies like ones done by the neuroscientist Rick Hanson show that we must consciously hold onto a positive thought or feeling for a minimum of 15 seconds before it leaves any imprint in the neurons. The whole dynamic, in fact, is called the Velcro/Teflon theory of the mind. We are more attracted to the problem than to the solution, you might say.” But after I started reading Guinea Pigs:Technologies of Control, by John Hall, I thought: No wonder we are negative–we have a heap of things to be negative about. Hall’s main theme is that the public is the focus of non-consensual experimentation, started after WWII and continuing today. Doctors working for the Nazis carried out such experiments on concentration camp victims, and these medical doctors and psychiatrists and physicists were brought to the US after the war to continue their research. There were about 1600 of them. They became leaders in our space programs and other industries. They did surgery without anesthesia, for example, and psychiatry was used as a punitive tool for controlling political dissidents. They continued this type of work for the CIA, newly formed after the war. The nonconsensual experimentation by the Nazis was already being done in the US. The first eugenics law was passed in Indiana in 1907. According to a Yale study the movement aimed at improving society through selective breeding, indicating that forced sterilizations were carried out on a much larger and longer scale than previously believed. There is no legislation in the US that prevents government agencies from experimenting on the public. In 2011 the Bioethics Commission convened 4 meetings to address current safeguards against nonconsensual human experimentation. The author spoke at the first meeting. At each meeting there were greater than 100 people voicing complaints of nonconsensual experimentation with directed energy and electromagnetic weapons. The number of individuals voicing these complaints grew so large by the 4th meeting that the chairman of the Commission, Amy Gutmann, asked that individuals complaining about directed energy “research” not attend. The following is a brief and incomplete history of nonconsensual experimentation sponsored by US Government agencies: 1919-1922: testicular transplant experimentation on 500 prisoners at San Quentin; 1927: Carrie Buck was sterilized against her will in Charlottesville, Virginia; 1931: Dr. Cornelius Rhoads conducts cancer experiments on Puerto Rican subjects by injecting them with cancer cells under the auspices of the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Investigations; 1932-1972: The US Public Health Service and the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama test Syphilis bacteria on 400 poor black share-croppers. They were repeatedly refused treatment and the experimentation didn’t end until a reporter brought it to light; 1946-1953: Atomic Energy Commission feeds residents at the Fernald School in Massachusetts irradiated Quaker Oats to study the effects of radiation ;1949: Intentional release of Iodine 131 and xenon 133 over Hartford, Washington by Atomic Energy Commission in a study called “Green Run”;1950: Dr. Joseph Stokes from the University of Pennsylvania deliberately infects 200 female prisoners with viral hepatitis; 1940-current: Mind control experimentation begins on population under MKULTRA and other pseudonyms which has continued into current times. CIA mind control studies were brought to light by the Rockefeller Commission in 1975. In that same year, the Church Committee shed light on unethical behavior by the CIA, the FBI and the NSA. This just gets worse. MKULTRA creates multiple personality disorder in a person so that person can be sent out to assassinate someone. Or there is psychic remote influencing/assassination.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s